National Dialogue and Review of Policy Regarding National Athletes Serving National Service

The following question stood in the name of Mr Seah Kian Peng –

4 To ask the Minister for Defence (a) whether the Ministry intends to hold a national dialogue on expectations of national athletes serving their National Service (NS); and (b) whether there will be a review of the policy regarding such athletes and their NS obligations.

5 Mr Leong Mun Wai asked the Minister for Defence (a) whether the Government will relax the eligibility criteria for National Service (NS) deferment for young male Singaporeans who have the potential to accomplish significant successes in the sports and arts fields; and (b) whether the Government will consider deferring NS for young male Singaporeans who have the potential to accomplish significant successes in fields other than sports and arts.

Mdm Deputy Speaker: Mr Seah Kian Peng. Not here. Mr Leong Mun Wai.

Mr Leong Mun Wai (Non-Constituency Member): Question No 4, please.

The Minister for Defence (Dr Ng Eng Hen): Mdm Deputy Speaker, may I please take Question Nos 4 and 5 together?

Mdm Speaker: Please proceed.

Dr Ng Eng Hen: This year, we commemorate 55 years of National Service (NS). Singapore remains one of the few countries where NS enjoys high levels of public support. How high, you might ask. Well, every year, we take polls, similar to other questions asked by other Government agencies. In 2021, 96% of Singaporeans polled affirmed that NS is critical for the defence and security of our country. Let me tell you, 96%, even for our country, is highly unusual. There are very few questions that you can get above 85%, let alone 90% or 95%.

Today, more than one million have served NS. Each year, every young male citizen and Permanent Resident (PR) puts his personal commitment into action by enlisting into SAF or Home Team for full-time NS.

We have had this high support of NS for many years now and I want to make clear to Members of this House that this strong support that Singapore enjoys is an exception and not the norm, compared to other countries with military conscription.

If you study the global landscape of countries that have mandatory national service, compared to when we first started it 50-odd years ago, the list of countries has shrunk significantly. I have spoken in this House about the Baltic states which gave up national service, only to wish today that they did not. But not only in terms of just countries that have managed to keep their national service, but many countries were forced to cut their national service commitments for a variety of negative reasons.

So, it would be a serious mistake if we take that affirmation we receive today from Singaporeans for NS, that we take it for granted, or think it came by happenstance. On the contrary, this strong support, why it is that we have been able to keep such high levels of national support, there is one key reason.

We have held, unequivocally, the fundamental principles of universality and equity for NS. What does that mean? At its core, it means that all male Singaporeans and PRs who are fit and liable to serve, are conscripted for full-time National Service, as required by the Enlistment Act and not at a time of their choosing.

Further, during the two years that they serve NS, all personal goals are put aside and placed subservient to the higher duty to defend Singapore. It is a national commitment of the highest order and one that we all take very seriously. So much so, that for defaulters who reneged on their liability, our Courts have sentenced them to jail.

Let me quote from a 2017 High Court judgment: "In order to ensure Singapore's national security, every male Singaporean must serve National Service and at the time that he is required under the [Enlistment] Act, without regard to his personal convenience and considerations." I emphasise, "without regard to his personal convenience and considerations".

"When a person refuses to serve National Service at the time that he is required to and instead returns to serve at a time of his own choosing, or worse, at an age when he can no longer serve, his actions strike at the very core of the principles of national security, universality and equity."

These are strong words that underpin this collective and deep commitment to uphold NS, with just as strong a punishment for defaulters, who are sentenced to jail for choosing to do NS when and how they like.

Juxtapose that with those who ask for deferment, disruption, to come at a time of their choosing and to pursue their personal goals if they have sporting or arts talents. How do we rationalise this disparity?

We can only understand it because we apply very strict enforcement while, on the other hand, to those who must enlist for NS, we provide deferments and disruptions for any reason, sparingly, justified adequately and implemented openly. Otherwise, the system fails. If you are so harsh, as the main core of your policy, then you have to be very, very careful that your disruptions and deferments are sparing, justified openly and adequately.

Each appeal for deferment and disruption from sports and arts talent must, therefore, pass a very high bar. Each request is assessed on its own merit, in consultation with MCCY, taking into consideration the applicant's past achievements and potential to excel in international competitions and bring national glory.

We allow deferments and disruptions for arts and sports talents when there is a higher goal of national glory. But this deferment or disruption is not a licence to do away with your NS obligations. That must still be maintained. So, even when granted, there is no abdication of NS duties. And we have to ensure that the applicant's NS duties are taken seriously and that he must be trained to be competent in his assigned vocation. This will include periods like BMT, specialists and commanders' courses, and his unit's key operations, which the applicant must fulfil as part of his NS duties, even if he is granted deferment and disruption.

Now, even with these strict criteria, I must inform the House that not all Singaporeans support deferment or disruption for sportsmen. I quote a letter published in The Straits Times in May of this year, quote: "Let us not set the precedent by letting individuals call for a dialogue for the benefit of a privileged few. Medals can bring glory to Singapore but it is more important to have people with commitment to serve National Service for Singapore's peace and security. All Singaporean sportsmen should know that if there is no Singapore, there is no sport to talk about."

I leave you to decide whether you agree with the views. I am quoting to tell you that there are Singaporeans, even despite the strict application of deferments and disruptions, do not agree with it.

MINDEF also receives letters from Singaporeans from time to time, questioning the fairness when deferred sportsmen receive financial rewards through endorsements, while others had to serve their NS as required. They asked if this was compatible with the assurance given that deferments or disruptions should not be for personal gain, but national glory.

I cite these criticisms to show that even when sparingly applied, deferments and disruptions can have a pernicious effect – to cause invidious comparisons that some are given preferential treatment and are not performing their NS duties.

MINDEF reiterates that all NS men must perform their duties, and their short-term disruptions or leave for sportsmen to train for and compete in international competitions are only allowed outside critical NS periods. And those who have benefited from these provisions in the most recent SEA Games include paddler CPL (NS) Koen Pang, hurdler CPT (Dr) Ang Chen Xiang and triathlete OCT Luke Chua, apart from the swimmers that you have read about.

Long-term deferments from full-time NS, such as those mentioned by Members, are exceptional, only for those who have potential to win medals at top-tier international competitions like the Olympic Games. And on this basis, swimmers Joseph Schooling and Quah Zheng Wen were granted eight years' and five years' deferment respectively for the 2016 and 2020 Olympics. [Please refer to "Clarification by Minister for Defence", Official Report, 5 July 2022, Vol 95, Issue No 64, Corrections by Written Statements section.]

From time to time, MINDEF convenes review committees to address these and other NS issues as top-down initiatives. And you will remember that the last NS Review Committee was just held and completed from 2020 to 2022. And I have reported on the recommendations of that review and the implementation to this House. But there is also space for ground-up dialogues. When the next review of NS policies is convened, MINDEF will incorporate views across the spectrum of supporters and detractors of deferments and disruptions for sports and arts talent.

After 55 years, I think we do have strong agreement on the common principles of NS – which is, everyone, regardless of talent or status, must fulfil their NS obligations as a first priority and all personal pursuits must be secondary to this during their full-time NS. And based on this understanding, for sporting talents who bring national glory to Singapore, we can and have allowed limited deferments and disruptions, but without compromising their NS obligations.

I am proud that our national athletes understand and accept this duty of NS. None of them has asked to be exempted from NS duties, including those who trained hard and participated in recent regional and international events. They understand that everyone must fulfil their NS duties, even if you are a sporting or art talent.

I also know that our national sportsmen want to do well in both – fulfil their NS duties and also win medals for Singapore; at least some of them. Some have achieved it, but it is not easy to attain and we must not set unrealistic expectations on all of them. However, for those who want to pursue both goals, MINDEF is prepared to allow more to disrupt to train and compete in international competitions during their full-time NS. This is on the understanding that they fulfil the full period required after their disruption and also perform their NS duties satisfactorily while in NS. Thank you, Mdm Deputy Speaker.

Mdm Deputy Speaker: Mr Leong Mun Wai.

Mr Leong Mun Wai (Non-Constituency Member): Deputy Speaker, first of all, I thank the Minister for the clarification. I have two additional questions to ask.

One, from what the Minister has said, we have policies in place for deferment for sportsmen and performing arts Singaporeans who can perform at the competitive and world level. But I think based on the reaction and feedback of the athletes recently that we read in the papers, there seems to be still insufficient leeway given. Just now, the Minister did mention a little bit about —

Dr Ng Eng Hen: Madam, I have answered the question quite adequately for the Member. I suggest he does not make another speech.

Mdm Deputy Speaker: Yes. Mr Leong, can you just ask your question?

Mr Leong Mun Wai: Okay, can I ask the Minister again to confirm that he will look into further relaxation for athletes who want to perform better in their —

Dr Ng Eng Hen: Madam, can I answer that question?

Mdm Deputy Speaker: Yes, please.

Dr Ng Eng Hen: Madam, I have gone to great lengths answering the basis of our deferments and disruptions. And I think my answer speaks for itself. Thank you.

Mr Leong Mun Wai: Okay, I thank the Minister for that.

Dr Ng Eng Hen: Point of Order, Madam —

Mdm Deputy Speaker: Mr Leong, do you wish to ask the question?

Mr Leong Mun Wai: I have asked the first question. So, I will ask my second question.

Mdm Deputy Speaker: Okay, please do so.

Mr Leong Mun Wai: My second question is: while the Minister has said that personal development should be secondary to National Service, I think as our society becomes more sophisticated, there is also a need —

Dr Ng Eng Hen: Point of order, Mdm Deputy Speaker. Is this a further point or a clarification?

Mdm Deputy Speaker: He is asking a question, so let him do it. Mr Leong, please get to your question.

Mr Leong Mun Wai: Yes, please allow me. So, there is also a need for us to give more room for our talents to develop. And the situation we have now today —

Mdm Deputy Speaker: Mr Leong, please ask your question.

Mr Leong Mun Wai: Yes, we have a situation now today, that while we are hindering the development of our sports and arts talents by not granting them enough deferment in some cases, there are also a lot of citizens by registration that are not performing —

Dr Ng Eng Hen: Mdm Deputy Speaker, I do not hear a clarification.

Mdm Deputy Speaker: Mr Leong, I am going to ask you one more time. Please ask your question. Otherwise, please take your seat.

Mr Leong Mun Wai: I thought I am asking the question.

Mdm Deputy Speaker: Well, you are making a lot of statements. I have not heard a question from you.

Mr Leong Mun Wai: Okay, so, let me ask the question again. Is it fair that while we are hindering the development of our talents by not granting them deferment, citizens by registration are also not doing NS?

Mdm Deputy Speaker: Minister.

Dr Ng Eng Hen: Mdm Deputy Speaker, that is an utter mischaracterisation —

Mdm Deputy Speaker: Mr Leong, you may take your seat.

Dr Ng Eng Hen: — that citizens by registration are not doing their National Service. I think he has filed a separate question and I think he can read the reply.

Mdm Deputy Speaker: Mr Leong, please take a seat now. Minister has answered your question.

Mr Leong Mun Wai: No, I asked a question and the Minister said that he is not answering the question.

Mdm Deputy Speaker: Your question is not related to the Parliamentary Question you have filed. So, please take a seat.

Mr Leong Mun Wai: Okay, thank you.

Mdm Deputy Speaker: Dr Tan Wu Meng.