International Benchmarks to Track Reliability and Safety of MRT System
Ministry of TransportSpeakers
Summary
This question concerns the assumptions behind the 2020 target of one million mean kilometres between failures (MKBF) and the international benchmarks used to assess MRT reliability and safety. Mr Gan Thiam Poh inquired about these metrics, to which Minister for Transport Khaw Boon Wan explained that the target was updated to match the top-tier performance of systems like the Taipei Metro and Hong Kong MTR. Minister for Transport Khaw Boon Wan noted that MKBF is a globally recognised indicator monitored by industry groups such as CoMET and Nova to benchmark rail performance against international peers. He highlighted that while reliability is a priority, the Land Transport Authority and Public Transport Council also track safety, punctuality, and commuter satisfaction through various indicators and annual surveys. The Ministry aims to achieve this stretch target by accelerating asset renewal and expanding the rail network to enhance system resilience and the overall commuter experience.
Transcript
61 Mr Gan Thiam Poh asked the Minister for Transport (a) what are the assumptions for the 2020 target of 1,000,000 mean kilometres between failures (MKBF) that have been made for our MRT system; (b) what other international benchmarks are available to track the reliability and safety of our MRT system; and (c) whether the Ministry will consider designing new yardsticks to better reflect the actual experiences of commuters
Mr Khaw Boon Wan: Two years ago, I challenged the rail operators to significantly improve the reliability of our Mass Rapid Transit (MRT) services and make them among the most reliable in the world. We launched a multi-year effort to bring this about and actively track our performance against the best in class. The Taipei Metro and Hong Kong Mass Transit Railway (MTR) were picked as our benchmarks, using Mean Kilometres Between Failure (MKBF) for delays exceeding five minutes as the objective measure of train reliability.
As Taipei and Hong Kong were able to achieve an MKBF of 800,000 train-kilometre (km), I set that as our target. Last year, after Taipei achieved an MKBF of one million train-km, I updated our 2020 target to one million train-km, as I am determined to close the reliability gap with the best in class. It is a stretch target but, with determination and focus, it is within our grasp. We will also speed up our asset renewal programmes and continue to add new lines to enhance the resilience of our rail network.
MKBF is an internationally recognised indicator for rail reliability. There are industry groups of large, medium and small metros, such as Community of METros (CoMET) and Nova which publish MKBF data for benchmarking by peers. Based on their data, there are only a handful of metros globally that have achieved an MKBF of one million train-km or better.
We have focused on train reliability as the key area for improvement. However, commuter experience is shaped by a host of other factors, like safety, punctuality, cleanliness and comfort. The Land Transport Authority tracks all these indicators, too. In addition, the Public Transport Council monitors commuter experience through its annual Public Transport Customer Satisfaction Survey.
We have some way to go before we reach our MKBF target of one million train-km. Recent setbacks have affected commuters’ perception of the progress we have made. We are redoubling our efforts and we seek commuters’ patience and understanding.