Accountability Review of Government Officers Following Lapses in Controls
Ministry of FinanceSpeakers
Summary
This question concerns Ms Foo Mee Har’s inquiry to Minister for Finance Heng Swee Keat regarding accountability reviews for officers involved in financial control lapses reported in the Auditor-General’s Report for Financial Year 2016/17. Minister for Finance Heng Swee Keat clarified that agency heads are responsible for investigating lapses and taking disciplinary actions commensurate with an officer's culpability and the severity of the error. He stated that the lapses were due to individual negligence or human error rather than systemic weaknesses, and that these incidents will be factored into the officers' performance appraisals. Of the fourteen observations cited, rectification and staff actions have been completed for nine, with the remaining five expected to be finished by October 2017. The Auditor-General’s Office and the Public Accounts Committee will ensure follow-up actions are taken, as agencies are held publicly accountable for addressing these reported shortcomings.
Transcript
29 Ms Foo Mee Har asked the Minister for Finance whether there will be an accountability review of Government officers involved, given the lapses in financial controls in grants administration, management of development projects, as well as IT governance, as reported in the Report of the Auditor-General for Financial Year 2016/17.
Mr Heng Swee Keat: Ms Foo asked about accountability review of the officers involved. The head of each of the agencies concerned, be it the Permanent Secretary of a Ministry or the Chief Executive of a Statutory Board, is responsible for investigating the cases under his agency, rectifying the lapses and taking the appropriate disciplinary actions.
The lapses highlighted this year by the Auditor-General's Office (AGO) were due to individual negligence, human errors or situations where procedures were in place but not followed. There is no evidence of a systemic weakness within Government agencies in terms of compliance. The officers responsible for these lapses will be held accountable and will be subject to disciplinary actions, commensurate with the officer's culpability and the severity of the mistake. The lapses will also be considered when appraising the officer's performance.
As of today, of the 14 observations in the AGO report, rectification and staff actions have been completed for nine while the remaining five are in progress. They are expected to be completed, latest by October 2017. The AG has also said it will ascertain that follow-up actions are taken. As it has demonstrated in past years' reports, AGO will not hesitate to highlight situations where it finds that agencies have failed to follow up as they had indicated. Agencies are also accountable to the Public Accounts Committee (PAC) and PAC reports are publicly available.