Review Policies and Health Data on Children Injured in Motor Accidents and Child Car Seats in Taxis
Ministry of HealthSpeakers
Summary
This question concerns the collection of hospital data on children injured in motor accidents without child seats and the potential review of taxi policies, as raised by Mr Louis Ng Kok Kwang. Minister for Health Gan Kim Yong shared that 35% of injured children aged 10 and below reported using restraints, though data for the remaining 65% did not specify usage or confirm injury causality. He explained that taxis are exempt from child seat rules because street-hailing makes carrying diverse equipment impractical, whereas pre-booked private hire cars can accommodate specific passenger needs. The Minister noted that the current approach balances road safety with practicality, even though international literature confirms that appropriate child restraints are life-saving. Consequently, the Government continues to recommend that all motorists and passengers use appropriate restraints at all times to reduce the risk of sustaining severe injuries.
Transcript
4 Mr Louis Ng Kok Kwang asked the Minister for Health (a) whether public hospitals are now collecting public health data on the number of children injured in motor accidents as a result of not being secured in child car seats; (b) if not, why not; and (c) if so, whether the Government will use the data in the review of its policies on child car seats in taxis.
Mr Gan Kim Yong: Under the Road Traffic Act (RTA), a person below 1.35 metres in height should be properly secured by an approved child restraint appropriate to their height and weight, or a body restraining seat belt when seated on a booster seat cushion or when using a seat with an approved adjustable seat belt when travelling in a motor vehicle.
Over the past five years, data from the public acute hospitals showed that of the children aged 10 and below1 who were treated at public acute hospitals for injuries due to motor vehicular accidents, about 35% reported (by patient or parents) that child car seats and/or seatbelts2 were used. There is no data on whether or not child car seats and/or seatbelts were used for the remaining 65% of cases. The data does not show whether the injury sustained from motor vehicle accidents was a direct result of not using child car seats and/or seatbelts.
Nonetheless, it is well established in international literature that the use of appropriate protective gear and child restraints such as car safety seats, booster seats and seat belts when travelling in motorised vehicles is potentially life-saving and reduces the risk of sustaining severe injuries. Therefore, the Government consistently recommends motorists and their passengers to use appropriate restraints at all times while riding in motor vehicles.
Taxis are exempted from the child seat rule under the RTA because they can be street-hailed, and it is not practical to expect taxis to be sufficiently equipped with child seats at all times to cater to families of different sizes and children of different ages, while providing sufficient boot space for passengers' needs. On the other hand, private hire cars, which must be pre-booked, allow passengers to indicate if they require child seats at the point of booking. The current approach for taxis and private hire cars strikes a balance between safety and practicality.