Resolution of Neighbour Disputes over Cigarette Smoke
Ministry of LawSpeakers
Summary
This question concerns Er Dr Lee Bee Wah’s inquiry into compulsory mediation for cigarette smoke disputes, settlement adherence, and resolution options when parties decline mediation. Minister K Shanmugam explained that while initial mediation is voluntary, the Community Disputes Resolution Tribunals (CDRT) can mandate it for intractable cases. Failure to comply with CDRT orders may lead to Special Directions or Exclusion Orders, while settlements at the Community Mediation Centre are binding contracts enforceable through civil proceedings. For cases that do not proceed with mediation, parties typically resolve issues through direct communication or assistance from grassroots and community leaders. This tiered approach ensures that while informal resolution is encouraged, legal mechanisms exist to compel cooperation and ensure compliance in persistent disputes.
Transcript
2 Er Dr Lee Bee Wah asked the Minister for Law with regard to neighbour disputes concerning cigarette smoke (a) whether mediation can be made compulsory for all involved parties; (b) whether there is any follow-up to ensure respondents continue to adhere to the terms of a settlement; and (c) for those who do not proceed with mediation, how are these disputes typically resolved.
Mr K Shanmugam: Community mediation is generally a voluntary process and can be proceeded with only if both parties agree to mediate.
For cases that do not proceed with mediation, the parties may end up resolving their issues through other informal means. For example:
(a) they have directly communicated with each other and arrived at a resolution; or
(b) grassroots or community leaders have assisted the parties to hold a conversation that leads to a satisfactory outcome for them.
However, for intractable cases where parties are unable to resolve their disputes by voluntary mediation or other informal means, the aggrieved party can file a case with the Community Disputes Resolution Tribunals (CDRT) as a last resort. The CDRT judge can order the parties to attend mandatory mediation in the Courts or at the Community Mediation Centre (CMC), attend counselling or fix the case for hearing.
Therefore, while community mediation is generally voluntary, an avenue of compulsory mediation does exist and the failure to comply with the CDRT's order to attend mediation may attract legal consequences. Where the CDRT judge, on hearing the parties, decides to make a Court Order, this order can entail the payment of damages, require a party to do or refrain from doing something (for example, take measures to prevent cigarette smoke from drifting into neighbouring units), or apologise. If a party breaches the Court Order, the other party can apply for a Special Direction to ensure compliance. A refusal to comply with a Special Direction may lead to, among other measures, an Exclusion Order. This requires the non-compliant party to move out of his home.
Written settlements reached by parties through mediation at CMC are private contracts. These contracts are binding on both parties. The aggrieved party, therefore, has the option to enforce the agreement through civil proceedings. Alternatively, if the parties feel it may be useful, CMC will offer parties another round of mediation at no further cost.