Oral Answer

Reports of Protection from Online Falsehoods and Manipulation Act Offences Related to COVID-19

Speakers

Summary

This question concerns the volume and outcome of COVID-19-related reports under the Protection from Online Falsehoods and Manipulation Act (POFMA) between 2020 and 2022, as raised by Ms He Ting Ru. Senior Minister of State Dr Janil Puthucheary reported that the POFMA Office received over 280 feedback pieces, resulting in four cases and seven directions. He noted that the Government usually identified falsehoods independently and prioritized public communication through tools like the Gov.sg WhatsApp channel to address information gaps. Surveys indicated these efforts built public trust, with 75% of citizens feeling well-informed and over 86% reporting that messages aided their vaccination decisions. Such concerted communication was essential for achieving high vaccination coverage and ensuring the effectiveness of national COVID-19 measures.

Transcript

22 Ms He Ting Ru asked the Minister for Communications and Information in each of the years between 2020 and 2022 (a) how many POFMA reports are received by the various Ministries that relate to COVID-19; and (b) how many of such reports resulted in no further action being taken.

The Senior Minister of State for Communications and Information (Dr Janil Puthucheary) (for the Minister for Communications and Information): Sir, between 2020 and 2022, the Protection from Online Falsehoods and Manipulation Act (POFMA) Office received over 280 pieces of feedback and enquiries related to COVID-19 issues. This included public feedback to various Government agencies on potential COVID-19 falsehoods that were redirected to the POFMA Office. There were four POFMA cases involving the issuance of seven POFMA directions that were linked to such public feedback.

Mr Speaker: Ms He Ting Ru.

Ms He Ting Ru (Sengkang): I thank the Senior Minister of State for the reply. I just have a very quick supplementary question. Just wondered, what was the assessment of the effectiveness of the POFMA legislation and, obviously, all the tools available under the POFMA regime given to the Ministries in the various authorities in order to combat these falsehoods that resulted from COVID-19-related misinformation being circulated?

Dr Janil Puthucheary: Sir, in all the cases that I have mentioned, where action was taken, the Government was already aware of the falsehoods prior to receiving the feedback and had begun an assessment of the falsehoods. The Government took and continues to treat COVID-19 misinformation very seriously, even if the feedback did not result in a POFMA action. The feedback highlighted gaps and understanding that potentially would deserve attention.

As a result, other than the POFMA direction, the Government has also used public communication and education efforts to provide accurate and timely information relating to COVID-19. This includes, providing up-to-date information directly to Singaporeans through various channels, such as the Gov.sg's WhatsApp channel, which grew to over 1.2 million subscribers during the pandemic.

Some of our polls in 2022 show that three in four members of the public think that the Government has provided sufficient information on COVID-19. A 2021 survey showed that over 86% agreed that these messages helped in their decision to get vaccinated.

Our actions and our concerted efforts to counter COVID-19 misinformation contributed to high levels of public trust, which have allowed us to come together as a country to achieve high vaccination coverage and implement effective COVID-19 measures.