Written Answer to Unanswered Oral Question

Protocol for Investigation and Release of Foreign Visitors Detained for Criminal Offences

Speakers

Summary

This question concerns the investigation protocols for foreign visitors detained for criminal offences and whether diplomatic interventions influence legal outcomes, specifically regarding two Italian swimmers cautioned for shoplifting. Mr Gerald Giam Yean Song asked for details on the investigative process and why the individuals were only issued a warning and an entry ban. Coordinating Minister and Minister K Shanmugam clarified that Singapore applies a uniform framework to all offenders based on offence severity, circumstances, and case precedents. He explained that consular access under the Vienna Convention does not impact legal proceedings and confirmed that no diplomatic pressure influenced the swimmers' case. Coordinating Minister and Minister K Shanmugam concluded that the 12-month conditional warning and entry ban were appropriate given the recovery of the $150 in stolen items.

Transcript

77 Mr Gerald Giam Yean Song asked the Coordinating Minister for National Security and Minister for Home Affairs (a) what is the protocol for the investigation and release of foreign visitors detained for a criminal offence; (b) whether diplomatic intervention from a foreign embassy can influence the legal outcome of such a case; and (c) why are two Italian swimmers recently issued only a warning and an entry ban for a shoplifting offence.

Mr K Shanmugam: The two swimmers were treated in accordance with a framework for treating offenders, based on types of offences committed, and the same framework applies to all persons, whether foreign or local. Singaporeans are treated similarly.

In the case of foreign offenders, the Singapore authorities will inform them of their right to consular access upon their arrest or detention. Should they request consular access, we will inform the embassy, so that the embassy can provide consular assistance as appropriate. This is a requirement under the Vienna Convention on Consular Relations, to which Singapore is a party. Singaporeans have similar rights if they are arrested or detained in other countries. The provision of consular assistance has no bearing on the investigation process and legal outcome.

In the case of the two Italian swimmers, they stole items worth about $150. The items were recovered.

After they were arrested, the two requested consular access. The Police alerted the Italian embassy of their arrest and continued their investigations. There were no diplomatic interventions to influence the legal outcome.

In deciding on the appropriate course of action for a case, the Police and Attorney-General's Chambers (AGC) will generally consider the following factors: (i) the facts and circumstances of the case, (ii) the severity of the offence, (iii) any aggravating or mitigating factors; and (iv) how similar cases have been treated. In this case, the Police and AGC assessed that a 12-month conditional warning was appropriate. Given that they are foreigners, an entry ban was also imposed. Such a ban will, obviously, not be applicable to Singaporeans.