Written Answer to Unanswered Oral Question

MUIS' Review of Asatizah Recognition Scheme

Speakers

Summary

This question concerns the review of the Asatizah Recognition Scheme (ARS) following a restriction order issued to a former religious teacher, as raised by Prof Fatimah Lateef. She inquired about the implementation of new evaluation domains, provisional observation periods, and compulsory face-to-face interviews for applicants. Minister for Environment and Water Resources and Minister-in-charge of Muslim Affairs Masagos Zulkifli B M M responded that the ARS mandates adherence to a Code of Ethics prohibiting extremism and segregationist practices. He confirmed that measures such as provisional observation, additional interviews, regular training, and periodic reviews are currently utilized to ensure the suitability of asatizah. The Minister emphasized that the Asatizah Recognition Board and MUIS will continue monitoring teachers and cancelling registrations for ethical breaches to preserve social harmony.

Transcript

39 Prof Fatimah Lateef asked the Minister for Environment and Water Resources & Minister-in-charge of Muslim Affairs in view of the recent restriction order meted out to a former religious teacher recognised under the Asatizah Recognition Scheme (a) how is MUIS reviewing the Scheme; and (b) whether there will be newer domains for consideration, provisional periods of observation and compulsory face-to-face interviews before final approval of applications under the Scheme.

Mr Masagos Zulkifli B M M: The Asatizah Recognition Scheme, or ARS, requires all Muslim religious teachers, or asatizah, to abide by a Code of Ethics. This includes not encouraging extremism or violence, denigrating other racial and religious groups, committing ethical misconduct and promoting segregationist practices. The Asatizah Recognition Board, or ARB, oversees the ARS, supported by the Islamic Religious Council of Singapore, or MUIS. The ARB consists of senior and respected asatizah in the community.

In her PQ, the Member refers to the case of Mr Murad Mohd Said, who was placed on a Restriction Order in December 2018. Murad's ARS-recognition was cancelled in May 2018, after Murad contravened the ARS Code of Ethics. This is how the ARS system should work. It monitors and takes action to bar those whose views are inimical to social cohesion from preaching.

I wish to assure the Member that the ARB and MUIS take ARS registration seriously. Processes have been put in place to ensure that our asatizah registered with the ARS can perform the role that the community entrusts them to do. These processes include, as the Member has suggested, instituting provisional periods of observation and requiring additional interviews when deemed necessary by the ARB.

All ARS-asatizah are also required to go for regular training, and their suitability are periodically reviewed. If there are reports or if they demonstrate that they are unfit to be asatizah, such as breaching the Code of Ethics, their ARS status will be cancelled.

Both MUIS and the ARB conduct regular reviews of the ARS system. The ARS is meant to build up and support our asatizah community, so that they are reliable and credible sources of religious knowledge for the Muslim community, and play an important role in fostering peace and harmony.