Measures to Help Build Stronger Marriages and Families
Ministry of Social and Family DevelopmentSpeakers
Summary
This question concerns alternative dispute resolution for family conflicts and proactive marriage support, as raised by Mr Seah Kian Peng. Minister for Social and Family Development Mr Desmond Lee emphasized shifting from adversarial litigation toward restorative and therapeutic justice to prioritize relationship repair and child well-being. He announced that a joint committee involving the Ministry of Social and Family Development, Ministry of Law, and Family Justice Courts will be established to enhance multidisciplinary resolution methods. To strengthen marriages, the Ministry continues to fund enrichment programmes and workshops through community partners like the Families for Life Council, creating a more holistic and restorative family justice ecosystem.
Transcript
7 Mr Seah Kian Peng asked the Minister for Social and Family Development (a) whether the Ministry will consider alternative resolution methods for family conflicts and how the fallout and repair of family relationships can be better managed for better child and family outcomes; and (b) how will the Ministry proactively and pre-emptively help couples build strong marriages and families.
The Minister for Social and Family Development (Mr Desmond Lee): Mr Speaker, Sir, family conflicts and disputes can have long-lasting impact and consequences on families. Children are particularly vulnerable.
Several types of family conflicts and issues go before the Courts, such as divorce, maintenance, child custody matters, family violence and youth offending. With our rapidly greying population, we also expect to see more family disputes over mental capacity deputyship and doneeship issues.
In July 2014, the Committee for Family Justice recommended a number of changes to the family justice system. The focus was on reducing acrimony in family proceedings and ensuring that the interests of children were better looked after. Senior Minister of State for Law, Ms Indranee Rajah, had, in her reply earlier, given a good summary of the recommendations made and the enhancements that followed. But amongst other things, the Committee recommended that a judge-led approach be taken when adjudicating family disputes. Their recommendations culminated in the introduction of the Family Justice Act and the establishment of the Family Justice Courts.
The Committee had also recommended a more robust and integrated network of community assistance and support, which led to the establishment of divorce support specialist agencies (DSSAs). Today, the Ministry of Social and Family Development (MSF) has set up four DSSAs, which are run by voluntary welfare organisations.
In terms of reducing the adversarial nature of family disputes, the adoption of the judge-led approach and the child-centric focus in the Family Justice Courts are significant steps in the right direction. However, the fact remains that resolution of the dispute is still being sought through the Courts. Court-based litigation is inherently adversarial, costly and potentially complex. Research tells us that taking a "family" problem to Court can increase mistrust between the parties, reduce the likelihood of durable settlement and stoke more litigation if parental and family conflict is prolonged.
We, therefore, need to consider if there are other appropriate, multidisciplinary methods to resolve family conflict which can reduce the adversarial nature of litigation. At the same time, while mediation and counselling have been used as a core dispute resolution mechanism for some years, we want to see how it can be extended even further.
Sir, the concept of restorative justice is usually thought of in the context of criminal justice, between offender and victim. It is an approach that emphasises the need to repair the harm done and restore relationships that have been damaged. It can take place when offenders who have caused the harm reached a point when they fully, freely and genuinely admit their actions and are willing to take responsibility for them.
However, the core elements of restorative justice, principally the healing of relationships, reopening channels of communication, and empowering individuals to take active responsibility to repair the harm done, can potentially be applied to family conflicts as well. It can help to keep the focus on restoring family functionality through repairing family relationships.
Sir, the concept of therapeutic justice focuses on the impact of law and the legal system on emotional life and the psychological well-being of people. It recognises that law is a social force that can either encourage certain behaviours or lead to certain consequences. Therapeutic justice involves looking into whether the law can be made or applied in a more therapeutic way to relationships, so long as other values, such as justice and due process, can be fully respected.
Sir, a stronger emphasis on restorative and therapeutic justice in family dispute resolution should see approaches, such as counselling, mediation and conciliation, being moved to the forefront. It holds out the hope that we can foster space for family members to deliberate and explore options, while having time to manage their emotions and adjust and come to terms with new or altered personal circumstances. Families should avail themselves of the suite of help services and not rush into commencing legal proceedings. When families find a way to repair or reach a new equilibrium in their relationships, it should also translate into durable agreements and long-term settlements. Importantly, children who are often the innocent victims of family conflict can benefit from a return to functioning family relationships, even if the family structure has been altered through say, a divorce.
In this regard, as the Senior Minister of State of Law had earlier mentioned, MSF, Ministry of Law and the Family Justice Courts (FJC) will be setting up a joint committee to study how we can further enhance the family law regime and explore multidisciplinary methods of family dispute resolution and Court-based resolution. The Committee will also examine how the concepts of restorative and therapeutic justice can be applied more extensively in the context of family dispute resolution. This new Committee will start work by the end of this year and will be headed by the Permanent Secretaries of both Ministries, together with the Presiding Judge of FJC. It will comprise representatives from the social services, legal practice, judiciary, academia and the Government.
We look forward to receiving the Committee’s recommendations in due course as we work towards creating an even more holistic, restorative and therapeutic family justice ecosystem.
The hon Member also asked how MSF encourages strong marriages and families. We work with community partners to offer a range of marriage support and enrichment programmes for couples at different stages of their married life. In addition, the Families for Life Council organises events, such as the annual Marriage Convention and Family 365 workshops, which cover topics, such as marriage, family life and personal life.
MSF remains committed to promoting and funding such programmes. We encourage couples and families to take part in these programmes and to proactively make full use of community resources which are available to them so as to strengthen family and marital relationships all through life.