Efforts Made to Investigate Open Cases against Four Companies under Transboundary Haze Pollution Act Initiated in 2015
Ministry of Sustainability and the EnvironmentSpeakers
Summary
This question concerns the investigation status of four companies under the Transboundary Haze Pollution Act (THPA) and the potential for whistleblower incentives. Assoc Prof Walter Theseira asked about ongoing efforts for cases initiated in 2015, to which Minister for the Environment and Water Resources Masagos Zulkifli B M M replied that four cases remain open. The Minister clarified that relevant company directors entering Singapore must assist investigations, and action will be taken against one director with an outstanding court warrant. He emphasized that while the THPA has not yet led to prosecutions in these cases, it serves to pressure companies toward responsible environmental behavior. Lastly, Minister for the Environment and Water Resources Masagos Zulkifli B M M stated that there are currently no plans to offer financial incentives to whistleblowers for information leading to prosecutions.
Transcript
10 Assoc Prof Walter Theseira asked the Minister for the Environment and Water Resources (a) whether, and to what extent, efforts are still being made to investigate the open cases against four companies under the Transboundary Haze Pollution Act initiated in 2015; and (b) whether the Ministry will consider giving whistleblowers some financial incentives to provide information leading to successful investigation and prosecution.
Mr Masagos Zulkifli B M M: Singapore enacted the Transboundary Haze Pollution Act (THPA) in 2014 to send a strong signal that we will not tolerate the irresponsible actions of errant companies, whether Singapore-based or otherwise, that harm our environment. In 2015, NEA issued legal notices under the THPA to six companies to take immediate measures to stop the fires that caused haze that affected Singapore. Two of the companies responded and explained that they were no longer associated with the affected lands. Upon further investigation, NEA accepted their explanation and closed these two cases. The cases against the other four companies are still open. If the directors of the relevant companies enter Singapore, they will be required to assist in our investigations. Action will also be taken against one of the directors who has an outstanding court warrant against him.
The THPA is not a panacea or the only tool to fight transboundary haze. Although none of the investigated companies has been prosecuted yet, the THPA has nevertheless put added pressure on companies to behave responsibly. We have no plans to offer financial incentives to whistle blowers at this moment.