Complaints against Employment Agencies for Obscuring Important Information of Migrant Domestic Workers in Each of Last Five Years
Ministry of ManpowerSpeakers
Summary
This question concerns complaints against employment agencies (EAs) for obscuring migrant domestic workers' (MDWs) information and the redress available to employers for such incidents. Mr Gerald Giam Yean Song inquired about historical data and investigation outcomes, leading Minister for Manpower Dr Tan See Leng to report 30 complaints out of 520,000 placements from 2016 to 2020. Minister for Manpower Dr Tan See Leng explained that 18 cases were investigated, with six resulting in composition fines or warnings while others lacked evidence. Under the Employment Agency Act, EAs must provide accurate MDW biodata, and MOM takes enforcement action against agencies that fail to fulfill these licensing conditions. Redress for affected employers includes fee refunds or worker replacements if employment cannot continue due to the EA’s failure to provide accurate information.
Transcript
51 Mr Gerald Giam Yean Song asked the Minister for Manpower (a) in each of the last five years, how many employers have lodged complaints against employment agencies for having obscured important information such as the past employment records of migrant domestic workers; (b) what are the outcomes of any investigations that took place relating to these incidents; and (c) what redress or compensation is extended to employers who are found to have been victims of unlawful actions by employment agencies.
Dr Tan See Leng: Employment agencies (EAs) are required under the Employment Agency Act to provide accurate information relating to the employment of any person. They are further required under the licence conditions to furnish the employment history and biodata of Migrant Domestic Workers (MDWs) to prospective employers.
Between 2016 and 2020, out of 520,000 MDWs placed by EAs, a total of 30 complaints related to providing inaccurate or incomplete information were received from employers. Twelve complaints either lacked sufficient information to substantiate the complaint, or were caused by misunderstandings between employers and EAs. Eighteen of them were investigated by MOM. Six resulted in composition fine or warning issued to the EA. No further action was taken for the remaining cases as the EAs were able to provide documentary evidence that the employer had been provided with the information on the MDW.
In cases where the MDW was unable to continue employment due to the EA’s failure to provide the relevant information accurately, the EA will have to either refund the fees paid by the employer or provide a replacement MDW.
The provision of accurate information to prospective employers is important to facilitate informed decision-making by employers. MOM takes every complaint seriously and will take enforcement action against the EA if the complaint is found to be substantiated.