Tapping Past Reserves for Land Reclamation Works
Ministry of FinanceSpeakers
Summary
This question concerns the use of past reserves for climate change protection and the roles of the President and Parliament in overseeing reclamation costs. Assoc Prof Walter Theseira inquired if reclamation would be funded from reserves to avoid tax increases, to which Second Minister Lawrence Wong replied that reclamation converts financial assets into state land without drawing on reserves. He clarified that sale proceeds return to the reserves and the President receives annual expenditure statements under an agreed framework. While smaller projects use ministry budgets and infrastructure may involve borrowing, reclamation costs are already met through the conversion of past reserves. Parliament maintains oversight by approving development expenditure in the annual Supply Bill, ensuring that reclaimed land remains a protected national asset.
Transcript
1 Assoc Prof Walter Theseira asked the Deputy Prime Minister and Minister for Finance (a) to what extent the policy of using past reserves to fund land reclamation will be applied to finance the projected $100 billion cost of climate change protection measures announced by the Prime Minister; and (b) what are the roles of the President and Parliament in approving or overseeing the use of past reserves for land reclamation-related climate change protection measures.
The Second Minister for Finance (Mr Lawrence Wong) (for the Deputy Prime Minister and Minister for Finance): Mr Speaker, we will need a combination of funding methods to finance the various climate change adaptation measures. Smaller scale infrastructure like localised flood barriers for public assets like hospitals and bus depots can be funded from the budgets of Ministries. For long-lived major infrastructure such as sea walls, the Government will look at the option of borrowing to spread the cost across the generations which will benefit. Where the measures include land reclamation, the land reclamation costs can already be met from Past Reserves.
Parliament debates and approves the Supply Bill every year. Under the Supply Bill, the Government seeks approval for development expenditure, which includes land reclamation costs. The land created through reclamation will be protected as part of Past Reserves. When such land is subsequently sold, the proceeds accrue fully to Past Reserves. The reclamation of land is in essence a conversion of Past Reserves from financial assets to state land. This use is not a draw on Past Reserves.
The use of Past Reserves to fund reclamation costs is in accordance with the Reserves Protection Framework, which is agreed between the President and Government. The Government provides the President with a statement on land-related expenditures annually.
MOF will continue to study equitable and sustainable ways to finance the full suite of climate adaptation measures we need to protect our island.
Assoc Prof Walter Theseira (Nominated Member): Mr Speaker, I thank the Minister for that reply. I just wanted to clarify – my understanding would be that when the Supply Bill is passed each year as part of the Budget, the policy then will be that any land reclamation cost will be clearly listed in that year's budget. The cost of that will be taken from the Past Reserves and therefore, will not be required to come from current tax expenditure. In the future, when the value of that land will be realised, it will be passed back to Past Reserves. So, in other words, is the commitment then, that in all such cases, the cost of land reclamation will be coming from the Past Reserves without a drawdown or the requirement to raise taxes currently, or is it going to be flexible based on the Finance Minister at the time?
Mr Lawrence Wong: Mr Speaker, as I have said just now, the Reserves Protection Framework already allows the Government to use the Past Reserves for all land reclamation projects. That is already the case today. And that is the basis for which we operate currently.