Small Fires on Expressways or Roads Caused by Cigarette Butts
Ministry of Home AffairsSpeakers
Summary
This question concerns the frequency of roadside vegetation fires and enforcement against cigarette butt littering, as raised by Dr Intan Azura Mokhtar. Second Minister Mrs Josephine Teo reported that about 350 such fires occurred annually between 2014 and 2017, with most attributed to discarded cigarette butts. An interagency task force coordinates fire prevention, while the National Environment Agency mitigates risks by regularly clearing dry leaves from roadsides. Offenders can be prosecuted under the Environmental Public Health Act or the Penal Code, though Second Minister Mrs Josephine Teo highlighted the difficulty in linking specific littering acts to fires. The government maintains strict enforcement to encourage civic-mindedness and public vigilance through the National Environment Agency’s reporting platforms.
Transcript
3 Dr Intan Azura Mokhtar asked the Minister for Home Affairs (a) how many cases of small fires on expressways or roads have been reported in the last five years; and (b) how many of these fires have been caused by errant motorists or motorcyclists who throw their cigarette butts onto the central dividers or roadside plants and trees.
The Second Minister for Home Affairs (Mrs Josephine Teo) (for the Minister for Home Affairs): Mr Speaker, the Singapore Civil Defence Force (SCDF) only started keeping records of roadside vegetation fires from 2014. Between 2014 and 2017, SCDF attended to about 350 such fires annually. Most of these fires were caused by cigarette butts.
SCDF leads an interagency task force to deal with vegetation fires. Among other measures, the National Environment Agency (NEA) regularly clears the roads of dry leaves, which are more susceptible to catching fire.
But no amount of clearing will help, if some members of the public continue to illegally and irresponsibly discard cigarette butts. Such persons can be charged under the Environmental Public Health Act for littering at the least, and if we can prove the fact that the fires also cause serious damage, such persons can be charged under the Penal Code for fire-related offences. We encourage the public to report such offences via NEA's website, its mobile app or its hotline.
Mr Speaker: Dr Intan Mokhtar.
Dr Intan Azura Mokhtar (Ang Mo Kio): I thank the Second Minister for her reply. I am a bit surprised to know that there are so many fires annually caused by cigarette butts on roads. We know that in public places and in our estates, NEA takes a very serious approach to littering. But it is probably a little bit difficult when motorists are on the go and they litter as they drive or ride. So, what other forms of action or enforcement can be taken against them? And to what extent are the fines imposed? Are there demerit points or compulsory community action, for instance, imposed on them once they are caught?
Mrs Josephine Teo: Mr Speaker, the Member asked a very good question. It is actually quite difficult. When you think of a vegetation fire, the fact is that it would not have started immediately, let us say, when a cigarette butt is discarded. It would take some time. So, hypothetically, even if someone happens to be at the right spot, at the right time, and manages to capture on camera or through video someone who had thrown a cigarette butt, it is not so easy to establish whether that particular fire started as a result of that particular littering incident.
There are no easy ways to prevent, except to appeal to people's civic-mindedness, except to make it a habit of reminding people that whenever you discard a cigarette butt, whether it is in a housing estate or anywhere, that could lead to some other situation, such as a fire. That is why NEA takes a very strict view of littering, especially when someone were to throw a cigarette butt. I am sure, as Members of Parliament, we have received appeals from our residents who tell us, "It was just that once" or "I wasn't thinking". But yet, NEA will have to take a strict view and really because, if it does result in a fire, it is not so easy to prove who did it. And yet, the damage could be serious.