Safe Usage of Park Connector Networks by Cyclists and PMD Riders
Ministry of National DevelopmentSpeakers
Summary
This question concerns the rules and safety measures for lane markings on the Park Connector Network (PCN) intended to segregate pedestrians and faster users. Mr Dennis Tan Lip Fong inquired if cyclists and pedestrians must adhere to specific lanes and what monitoring measures exist to ensure safety. Second Minister for National Development Mr Desmond Lee clarified that these markings are part of a pilot project to guide slower traffic to the left and faster devices to the right. He highlighted that NParks uses joint enforcement with LTA, physical infrastructure like speed strips, and public education to manage these shared spaces. The Minister noted that PCN safety ultimately relies on a combination of infrastructure, enforcement, outreach, and responsible user etiquette.
Transcript
11 Mr Dennis Tan Lip Fong asked the Minister for National Development in respect of paths on the Park Connector Network where one side of the path is marked "PCN" and the adjacent side has a sign of a person walking (a) whether cyclists or PMD riders are required to keep to the part marked "PCN"; (b) whether those who are on foot are required to keep to the side with the sign of a person walking; and (c) what are the measures taken to monitor and ensure safe usage of such paths by all users.
The Second Minister for National Development (Mr Desmond Lee) (for the Minister for National Development): Mr Speaker, park connectors are shared paths meant for all users. The lane markings that the Member speaks about are part of a pilot project started by NParks in 2018 to try to guide slower pedestrians away from faster bicycles, personal mobility devices and so on. This pilot was tried out on 30 km of the Park Connector Network (PCN) out of an entire network of some 330 km – so, less than 10% were taken in as part of this pilot.
For the lane on the left marked with the pedestrian sign, the intent was for this to be used primarily by pedestrians and other people who are moving more slowly, for example, on wheelchairs or assisted mobility devices. For the lane on the right marked with "PCN", the intent was for this to be used primarily by faster traffic, such as bicycles, personal mobility devices and other mobility devices
During the pilot period, NParks had carried out public outreach along these stretches. For instance, NParks officers go onsite to educate PCN users on how to use the PCNs safely. NParks has also put up physical banners and standees to promote responsible track etiquette. For hotspot areas, NParks works with LTA to conduct joint enforcement efforts against errant PCN users who exceed speed limits or ride recklessly. In addition, NParks has also been encouraging a "keep left" etiquette on our PCNs where slower users should keep left, while faster users overtake on the right.
In areas where there is sufficient space, and here, I am talking about sufficient width of the PCN, NParks will work towards having physically separated paths for the different user groups. To further ensure the safe usage of PCNs, NParks will continue to introduce safety measures, such as additional lighting, speed regulating strips and advisory signs at high usage areas. NParks will also continue to work with LTA and the community to promote the safe and orderly use of our PCNs.
Mr Dennis Tan Lip Fong (Non-Constituency Member): I thank the Second Minister for his reply. I have asked this question because I have observed that despite the markings, which I agree is quite helpful, actually, on the ground, a lot of people are not really following the markings. It has caused certain confusion which I witnessed personally and I have also witnessed accidents where you have PMDs or bicycles on the part marked with the "foot", and then, on the PCN marking, you have people walking. So, may I ask if NParks can increase the public messaging on the safe use of these paths.
Mr Desmond Lee: I thank the Member for his suggestions. If we think of a PCN, typically, they are between 2.5 metres and four metres. And it is a shared path – people who walk, who brisk walk, who jog, who run, who cycle, who use mobility devices. It is a shared space for people to move from place to place, for people to commute. And so, for the PCN to be a safe space for everyone depends on a couple of factors. One would be physical infrastructure. So, clear markings make it easier people to follow certain rules. Or physically segregated pathways – so you are very clear these are for pedestrians and these are for other users. That is one – physical infrastructure.
Second, the enforcement of rules. And NParks does enforce, like LTA, against reckless behaviour, against speeding. Thirdly, public outreach and education. As the Member rightly pointed out, we need to continue this effort to share with all PCN users about the safe use of PCNs and the co-existence of different users of PCNs. And lastly, of course, and I think probably the most important would be user consideration, user etiquette and the behaviour and habits of all PCN users. So, a combination of all these will make the PCNs a much safer space for everyone.