Plans to Enhance Awareness and Strengthen Policing of Illegal Subletting in Private Properties
Ministry of National DevelopmentSpeakers
Summary
This question concerns the prevalence of illegal subletting in private properties and strategies to enhance awareness and strengthen enforcement against offenders. Ms Rahayu Mahzam inquired about case statistics and potential plans for tougher legal actions against landlords, tenants, and agents involved in such breaches. Minister for National Development Lawrence Wong stated that URA investigates around 600 minimum stay and 1,000 occupancy cap breaches annually, working with management corporations to identify suspected units. He explained that while marginal breaches attract composition fines, serious offenders face court prosecution with penalties reaching $200,000 or 12 months’ imprisonment. The Minister emphasized that enforcement also extends to complicit estate agents via CEA and errant employers through MOM to ensure compliance.
Transcript
18 Ms Rahayu Mahzam asked the Minister for National Development (a) in the past five years, what is the number of cases of illegal subletting in private properties; (b) whether there is a need to enhance the awareness of private property owners about illegal subletting; and (c) whether the Ministry has any plans to further strengthen the policing of illegal subletting and take stronger legal action against agents, tenants or landlords who illegally sublet their properties.
Mr Lawrence Wong: Subletting of private residential properties is only allowed for stays of at least three consecutive months. There is also an occupancy cap of six unrelated persons in each unit.
In the past five years, URA investigated an average of about 600 cases involving suspected breaches of the minimum stay duration and an average of over a thousand cases of suspected breaches of the occupancy cap each year. In condominium developments, URA works closely with Management Corporations to raise awareness of the minimum stay duration and occupancy cap among homeowners and to identify units suspected to be in breach of the regulations. Where an offence is established, URA will take appropriate action against those responsible. These include not just direct perpetrators, but also landlords who fail to exercise the necessary due diligence to prevent infringements in their properties, even if the offence was carried out by the tenant.
For marginal breaches of the regulations, URA may issue a composition fine of up to $5,000. Since May 2019, URA has issued 23 composition fines for illegal subletting offences. Recalcitrant and serious offenders, for example, those operating on a commercial scale, will be prosecuted in Court and face significantly heavier penalties upon conviction, such as fines of up to $200,000 or imprisonment of up to 12 months.
Since the implementation of these measures, 18 individuals and companies have been prosecuted in court for illegal subletting offences. Of these offenders, 11 have been convicted and sentenced to fines as high as $70,000. Another seven cases are currently before the Courts. Several of these cases were reported in the media. We will continue to raise awareness of the regulations, as well as the penalties faced by those who breach them.
Apart from property owners and tenants, action will be taken against other parties responsible for illegal subletting offences. For example, where estate agents are found to be complicit in such offences, CEA will take action, which could include revoking the registration of the agent or debarring them for a period of time. MOM will also take enforcement action against errant employers who house foreign workers in poor living conditions.
URA will continue to step up its investigation and enforcement efforts.