Written Answer to Unanswered Oral Question

Fixing Defects Due to Design or Construction Flaws After Defects Liability Period

Speakers

Summary

This question concerns whether HDB rectifies systematic design or construction defects identified after the defects liability period and if Home Improvement Programme (HIP) funds can assist with repair costs. Associate Professor Jamus Jerome Lim raised these concerns, to which Minister Desmond Lee responded that HDB will rectify issues if technical assessments attribute them to contractor workmanship or design flaws, even after the one-year period. He clarified that HIP is scoped for specific maintenance in flats completed up to 1997 and is not intended to cover general construction defects, which are managed through a separate HDB process. Consequently, HIP funds are not used for such cost-sharing, but flat owners with financial needs may seek assistance from grassroots organisations and Community Development Councils to help cover repair costs.

Transcript

66 Assoc Prof Jamus Jerome Lim asked the Minister for National Development (a) whether HDB will consider defects that are identified after the expiry of the defects liability period but which clearly result from systematic design or construction defects by a single sub-contractor to still fall within the scope of reasonable rectification action; and (b) whether HDB will consider availing funds under the Home Improvement Programme for cost-sharing between lessees that experience such systematic defects especially with demonstrated financial need.

Mr Desmond Lee: It is not clear what the Member means by "systematic" design and construction defects. However let me explain the general approach to defects in HDB flats.

Design and construction defects identified within one year of completion of the BTO flat will be repaired by the building contractor as part of their responsibility under the Defects Liability Period (DLP). This is a standard industry practice for both public and private housing.

For issues reported after the DLP, HDB will investigate the likely cause and advise flat owners on the follow-up action based on the specific circumstances of each case. If the reported issues are caused by wear and tear, or a lack of proper maintenance, the costs of repair should be borne by the flat owners, as it is their responsibility to maintain and repair the fixtures and fittings of their flat. Where it is clear from technical engineering assessments that the reported issue is attributable to the contractor’s workmanship or arises from a design issue, HDB will rectify the issue. In HDB’s experience, issues arising many years after the DLP tend to be the result of wear and tear over time, much of which could be mitigated through regular maintenance.

Even though it is the home owners' responsibility to maintain their flats, HDB introduced the Home Improvement Programme, or HIP, to help owners of older HDB flats to address common maintenance issues in such flats. Currently, HIP includes items such as the repair of spalling concrete, and the repair of vertical wastepipes within the toilets if required. This is why we have certain age norms for blocks to be scheduled for HIP – currently those completed up to 1997. HDB reviews the items included in the HIP periodically to ensure they remain relevant to the needs of residents.

The HIP programme is scoped and budgeted to meet the cost of the items provided under HIP. It is not intended to cover design or construction defects in general. As explained earlier, HDB has a separate process to deal with such issues.

Flat owners who require financial assistance with household repairs can seek assistance from grassroots organisations and Community Development Councils.