Written Answer to Unanswered Oral Question

Factors for Persistent Oversubscription at Primary Schools with Reduced Intake Despite Increased Demand from New Housing Developments

Speakers

Summary

This question concerns the reasons for persistent primary school oversubscription and the criteria used to adjust Primary 1 intake amidst new housing developments. Ms Elysa Chen and Ms Diana Pang Li Yen asked about catchment reviews, support for balloted-out parents, and how demographic projections and nearby schools are factored into intake planning. Minister Desmond Lee responded that Primary 1 places are regularly reviewed against demographic trends, with about 98% of Singapore Citizen and Permanent Resident children securing a school of choice or within two kilometres. He clarified that intake adjustments address shrinking cohorts entering in 2027 and beyond to avoid school mergers and ensure viable educational programmes. Minister Desmond Lee added that unplaced students are posted to schools with vacancies within reasonable distance, and using a new property address requires a Vacant Possession Date within two years of entry and a 30-month residence commitment.

Transcript

92 Ms Elysa Chen asked the Minister for Education (a) what factors account for persistent oversubscription at certain primary schools in Bishan, relative to neighbouring estates; (b) whether the Ministry will review catchment boundaries or intake allocation in areas with sustained demand imbalance; and (c) what support does the Ministry offer to parents balloted out of their first choice.

93 Ms Diana Pang Li Yen asked the Minister for Education given that some primary schools may reduce Primary 1 intake despite rising demand from nearby new housing developments (a) what criteria does the Ministry use to determine or reduce school-level Primary 1 intake; and (b) how are local population density, projected school-age cohorts and the availability of alternative schools within two kilometres considered in planning.

Mr Desmond Lee: As mentioned in an earlier Parliamentary Question (PQ) in July, the Ministry of Education (MOE) regularly reviews the provision of Primary 1 places, taking into account demographic trends and upcoming housing developments. MOE ensures that there are sufficient Primary 1 places for Singaporean children at both the national and regional levels.

Nevertheless, demand varies across schools depending on parents' preferences. Some schools may be oversubscribed while neighbouring schools have vacancies. Parents who are unsuccessful in securing a place in their preferred school may participate in subsequent phase(s) they are eligible for. If a child remains unplaced after Phase 2C (Supplementary), MOE will post the child to a school within reasonable distance from home, subject to vacancies. Currently, around 98% of Singapore Citizen and Permanent Resident children obtain a place in a primary school of their choice or within two kilometres of their home. This has been stable over the past few years.

The Primary 1 intake for this year's Primary 1 Registration Exercise was adjusted because the cohort entering Primary 1 in 2027 and in subsequent years is getting smaller. This is part of MOE's broader effort to manage the impact of falling school enrolment. If this is not done, more schools may need to be merged, and this will affect the accessibility and geographical spread of schools across Singapore. The adjustments also help to ensure that our schools have sufficient student enrolment to offer a meaningful range of learning opportunities and programmes for their students.

On the use of a new property address, the Vacant Possession Date (VPD) must be within two years of the child's entry into Primary 1. The child must reside in that address for at least 30 months, starting from the time the family moves into the new address. MOE uses the VPD because it is the legally binding commitment for delivery of possession by the developer, as indicated in the Sale and Purchase Agreement. MOE does not accept an expected Temporary Occupation Permit date, as it is an estimated date by the developer that can be subject to change depending on construction progress. We continually review our policies and will consider such feedback.